PAPILLON // AS MEDIA FILM OPENING COURSEWORK - FINAL CUT

3/08/2017




This is the final cut of our coursework and there are quite a few things that changed after the rough cut. The most important thing we needed to change was to get the time down to just 2 minutes. Due to an inconvenience of deleting the rough cut from premiere pro, we had to start editing the video from the beginning which made it possible to be more restricted with the footage. We shortened the opening clips showing bits of the house from 29sec to 12sec and got rid of the black slides between the clips. We then tried to cut out unnecessary bits out of the conversation and soon got down to 2:08. 
The video needed a bit of colour correction to make it look more airy and to fit the old house and the location. We put an effect of an old broken tv on top of the scene of the moving horse and looked for a fitting sound effect to create a mysterious vibe. The created distortion at the end of the opening scene is done by putting the same footage twice on top of each other with one of them slightly moved to the right, and a greenish filter on top, which makes it look more mysterious. 
We then searched for some old music to cover the scenes that don't have any dialogue, used two different typewriter fonts for the credits and used the same font for the title at the end.
(PA)

PAPILLON // AUDIENCE FEEDBACK

3/08/2017

We asked ten Year 12’s to come into our lesson and watch the finished cut of our video. We had written a set of 4 questions for them to answer based on their opinions of our video. 
The questions we used were:

Do you understand the storyline?

8 people understood the storyline and 2 people said that they didn’t understand the storyline.

Would you want to continue watching if it were a whole

film?

All ten respondents answered yes to this question.

What did you like about the film opening?

6 of our respondents said that they enjoyed our film opening because it was intriguing and made you want to find out more about what’s going to happen. A few also said that they enjoyed the mysterious feel that it has to it. 2 of our respondents also mentioned that they liked our use of different camera angles and the editing, especially at the end.

What did you dislike about the film opening? 

The main thing that was said we could improve on was that our audio was quite quiet and they sometimes struggled to hear what the characters were saying. Five of our respondents said this was an issue for them and the other five said that they didn’t dislike anything.

EVALUATION QUESTION 6

3/05/2017

Question 6: What have you learned about technologies from the process of constructing this product? Since the beginning of year 12 when we started media our group has learned a great deal about filming and editing. One of our group members, Paula was already very experienced in making and editing videos because she regularly keeps a video diary for her own personal blog. However, the rest of us didn’t have any experience at all and therefore we were able to learn both from our lessons and our group member Paula. The rest of the people in our class used the cameras which our school provided (Cannon HFM 306) we could’ve done this but given that Paula had her own and more advanced camera we chose to use that instead. The camera we ended up using was a Nikon D3200 with a 35 millimeter 1.8 lens. This lens had the advantage of enabling us to be able to focus on a certain subject and blur out the background. This was a benefit because it meant that it eliminated any other distractions, which could have altered the viewer’s attention. We decided to use Adobe Premiere Pro to edit our video because it was more advanced than other options such as iMovie but was still simplistic enough for us to be able to use efficiently. Premiere Pro allowed us to use short clips of under 3 seconds which you aren't able to do on iMovie and we used a lot of in our film opening. We used short clips because it meant we were able to show a variety of different camera angles and skills within the two minutes. Paula had experience of editing videos but not in the software we decided to use so, therefore we were all able to learn and help create our video. We progressed a lot from our preliminary video which we did in the first few weeks of starting media. We did not know many people and this meant that filming was a bit awkward. We used two boys in our year and filmed one of them walking through a door and then sat down having a conversation about their subjects. There is lots of laughing in the background because the actors weren’t comfortable. In our final media product, our actors were more comfortable being in front of the camera. We did a number of practice tasks before completing our final film opening and one of these was the mise-en-scène task. We were given 5 features of mise-en-scene and told to cooperate them into a two-minute video. We used the young male actor who was also used in our final piece as he is one of our group member’s brothers. The video that we produced had a few areas that were not as professional looking as we would have liked so we aimed to and succeeded in changing that in our final piece. One of the main criticisms of our mise-en-scene task was that we had a clip in it which lasted 21 seconds which was way too long and got boring. Therefore in our final video, we made sure to use short clips to ensure we avoided repeating this. We also learned how to do special effects in our editing and this meant that we were able to incorporate them into final film opening. We used both diegetic and non-diegetic sounds in our video. The diegetic sounds were sounds that our actors could hear when filming such as the sounds of the gravel when Eve walked towards to the house in the first scene. The nondiegetic sounds which we hear are the sounds that were put in after over the top such as the sound of the walking stick throughout the two minutes. (JN)(EH)

EVALUATION QUESTION 3

3/03/2017

WHAT KIND OF MEDIA INSTITUTION MIGHT DISTRIBUTE YOUR MEDIA PRODUCT AND WHY?

We believe that our media product can be used for most distributers as it has a wide age range for target audience and horror films are seen everywhere. However there are some distributers that are better than others based on our target audience and the day and age that we live in now.

From research, we have found that most teens and adults prefer to stream videos rather than watch them directly from the TV. This means our media product would be viewed more on sites like Netflix rather than be put on TV as our target audience prefers this. Netflix has had millions of new subscribers since 2011 reaching around 90 million overall subscribers with nearly all being our target audience. 

The other distributer we believe will distribute our media product successfully is cinemas. Every year, cinemas show hundreds of horrors gaining lots of profits from them. We have found out that most of these viewers in cinemas are also teens and adults. Horrors are especially good in cinemas for adults and teens as they like going watch it with their friends and have the adrenaline/emotion running through their bodies from the film.

Both these distributers work really well together as it means that when our target audience gets home from work or school, they can watch our media product on Netflix. it then also means if they want to go out they can still see our media product as the cinema is an attractive place for teens and adults when going out and socialising.